Comparative Analysis – Understanding the Rhetorical Situation
Write an essay in which you show balanced analysis of your topic through the perspectives of the stakeholders.
Introduction: Your introduction should provide a comprehensive overview of the topic. You will provide background and context, as you note the main concerns of the issue at hand. As you conclude this introduction, map out the stakeholder you plan to identify in your paper.
Body: Note the stakeholders and their positions. For each stakeholder, write out at least one paragraph noting who they are, what their positions are, and why this topic is significant to their point of view and or causes.
Body: 2 to 3 paragraphs. Provide analysis and synthesis of the various viewpoints.
How are various positions noted in the body paragraphs citing single stakeholders similar and/or different?
What connects the stakeholders?
What do you see as similarities or differences?
What is the confounding issue that makes this topic so complex?
Stakeholders and Their Positions (level 1 header)
Stakeholder Positions (level 1 header)
Connecting Stakeholders (level 1 header)
Opinion on similarities and differences (level 2 header)
Confounding Issues (level 1 header)
Conclusion (level 1 header)
The stakeholders appear to be the science and medical fields, Political persons, Antivaxxers, and the undecided group and their families.
Related Completed Projects
Write a paper on the change that needs to be made for the betterment of all mankind today.
Can BACE inhibitors reduce amyloid beta accumulation in AD mice models?
Write a paper Investigating the water potential of potato using the weighing method.
Describe the methodological approach and research model aligned within the methodological approach (for example, Giorgi—empirical phenomenology, and Moustakas—transcendental phenomenology).