For this assignment, you will create a clinical guiding question know as a PICOT question. The PICOT question must be relevant to a nursing practice problem. To support your PICOT question, identify six supporting peer-reviewed research articles, as indicated below. The PICOT question and six peer-reviewed research articles you choose will be utilized for subsequent assignments. Use the ″Literature Evaluation Table″ to complete this assignment. Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population. In 200–250 words, provide a summary of the clinical issue. Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT question in your selected nursing practice problem area of interest. The PICOT question should be applicable to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project. Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem. Note: To assist in your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example: Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a desсrіption of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Systematic Reviews, Literature Reviews, and Metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles. Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment. PICOT Question and Literature Search – Rubric Summary of Clinical Issue 6 points Criteria Desсrіption Summary of Clinical Issue 5. 5: Excellent 6 points A clinical issue is thoroughly described. The issue relates to nursing practice. 4. 4: Good 5.64 points A clinical issue is presented. The issue relates to nursing practice. Minor detail is needed for clarity. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.98 points A clinical issue is summarized. The issue generally relates to nursing practice. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.5 points A clinical issue is partially presented. It is unclear how the clinical issue relates to nursing practice. Significant aspects are missing, or there are inaccuracies. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points A clinical issue is omitted or is not relevant to nursing practice. PICOT Question 12 points Criteria Desсrіption PICOT Question 5. 5: Excellent 12 points A PICOT question is clearly presented. The PICOT question format is applied accurately and presents an answerable and researchable question. 4. 4: Good 11.28 points A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is applied accurately. Some detail is need for support or clarity. 3. 3: Satisfactory 9.96 points A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is generally applied. Some information or revision is needed. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9 points A PICOT question is provided but is incomplete. The PICOT question format is used incorrectly. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points A PICOT question is not included. or are incomplete overall. Setting 6 points Criteria Desсrіption Setting 5. 5: Excellent 6 points The setting in which the researcher conducted the study is detailed and accurate for each article. 4. 4: Good 5.64 points The setting is indicated for each article. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the physical, social, or cultural site in which the researcher conducted the study. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.98 points The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.5 points The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points The setting is omitted for one or more of the articles. The setting described for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. Sample 6 points Criteria Desсrіption Sample 5. 5: Excellent 6 points The sample is indicated and accurate for each article. 4. 4: Good 5.64 points The sample is indicated for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.98 points The sample is indicated for each article. The sample described for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.5 points The sample is indicated for each article. The sample described for at least two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points The sample is omitted for one or more of the articles. The sample described for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. Method 6 points Criteria Desсrіption Method 5. 5: Excellent 6 points A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. 4. 4: Good 5.64 points A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.98 points The method of study for each article is presented. Some key aspects are missing for one or two articles, or there are some inaccuracies for the methods reported. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.5 points The method of study is partially presented for each article. Key information is consistently omitted. Overall, the methods reported contain inaccuracies. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of study are incomplete. Key Findings of the Study 6 points Criteria Desсrіption Key Findings of the Study 5. 5: Excellent 6 points Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with relevant details and extensive explanation. 4. 4: Good 5.64 points Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.98 points Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented for each article. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.5 points A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Recommendations of the Researcher 6 points Criteria Desсrіption Recommendations of the Researcher 5. 5: Excellent 6 points Researcher recommendations accurate are thoroughly described for each article. 4. 4: Good 5.64 points Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. 3. 3: Satisfactory 4.98 points Researcher recommendations for each article are presented. Researcher recommendations described for one article are inaccurate or incomplete. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.5 points Researcher recommendations are indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations described for two of the articles are inaccurate or incomplete. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Researcher recommendations are omitted for one or more of the articles. The recommendations described for three or more articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 12 points Criteria Desсrіption Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5. 5: Excellent 12 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. 4: Good 11.28 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. 3. 3: Satisfactory 9.96 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 9 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Related Completed Projects
Explain why the time period between 1783 and 1787 was so disorderly.
How can parents improve the mental health development of a child with ADHD?
What are the perceived barriers to accessing mental health services among black and minority ethnic groups in UK?
Write an essay on Diversity and Inclusion.