Outcome Alignment MLO 23 – Describe significant actions you will take in order to foster the child’s positive development, challenge the child to gain new competencies, and respect the child’s culture and individuality (Aligns with CLO 2) MLO 24 – Discuss developmental theories present when observing a child (Aligns with CLO 2) MLO 25 – Discuss approaches needed to understand a child’s family, their community, values and culture (Aligns with CLO 2) MLO 26 – Identify the informal and formal observation, documentation, and assessment strategies and tools needed to better understand a child’s development and learning needs (Aligns with CLO 2) MLO 27 – Create developmental goals for a child that can be supported in the early childhood program setting (Aligns with CLO 2) MLO 28 – Summarize actions an individual can take to promote positive development and challenge a child to gain new competencies (Aligns with CLO 2) Rubric ECE320 Portfolio Rubric ECE320 Portfolio Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation 10 pts Exemplary Presentation is colorful, detailed and thorough, and provides main content from Signature Assignment and overall conclusions. Audio and/or video present. 8 pts Meets Expectations Presentation has color, is detailed and provides content from Signature Assignment and overall conclusions. Audio and/or video present. 6 pts Needs Improvement Presentation is present, although lacking color and detail. Information is present, although would benefit from more detail and overall content provided in Signature Assignment. Audio and/or video not present or lacking. 4 pts Inadequate Presentation is present yet lacking detail, color, main content from Signature Assignment to be addressed. Audio/video not present or lacking. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis-Part I NAEYC Standards, Artifacts 25 pts Exemplary Challenges one’s own views using thorough analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Explanations are thorough, relevant, and meaningful. Provides thorough NAEYC standards and examples of artifacts. 20 pts Meets Expectations Challenges one’s own views using thorough analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Explanations are thorough, relevant, and meaningful. Provides NAEYC standards and examples of artifacts. 15 pts Needs Improvement Challenges one’s own views using analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Explanations are relevant and meaningful. NAEYC standards are lacking detail. 8 pts Inadequate Present, yet does not challenge one’s own views. Lacking in analysis, reflection, and inquiry. Expansion needed for explanations. NAEYC standards lacking detail and artifacts are not present. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis-Part II Rational of Artifact, Reflection 25 pts Exemplary Thorough and detailed integration of key concepts. Explained concepts in own words and applied by providing examples. Thorough explanation of rational of artifact present with supporting facts. Reflection shows changes in practice and commitment towards teaching. 20 pts Meets Expectations Detailed integration of key concepts. Explained concepts in own words and examples are present. Explanation of rational of artifact present with some supporting facts. Reflection shows some changes in practice and commitment towards teaching 15 pts Needs Improvement Integration of key concepts used. Some examples of concepts are present. Some rational of artifact present with no supporting facts. Reflection shows some changes in practice and commitment towards teaching 8 pts Inadequate Some integration of key concepts used.
