Discuss the strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages of each aspect of the methodology of each study in detail.

Assignment Plan: this should include the following subheadingsTitle page;Contents page;Introduction (here you should introduce your topic, using supportive text to identifying the issue, considering incidence and prevalence where appropriate, provide justification and relation to your practice). Your aims should be clearly stated and relevant to the module;Search strategy (remember you should provide justification for your search strategy and it should be totally reproducible by your reader);Literature Review ; Critically analyse, synthesise and evaluate one piece of evidence only. —- THIS PIECE OF WORK HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED ONCE SO THIS IS MY RESIT WORK. PLEASE READ ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW THINGS TO DO : Please DO NOT change what i’ve written only make change according to the feedback given by my mentor (Sharon Norman) which is written in colour and highlighted in COLOUR. Write according to the mark scheme uploaded and also i have uploaded a student assignment plan example please refer to writing style and layout. Also make sure there is 5 studies included. You need to include the latest PRISMA by Page et al (2020), include all details as advised above and reference appropriately ((D5) – REFER TO MARK SCHEME ) You need to ensure you analysis, synthesis and evaluation the literature in depth. Organise your literature review. You can start by analysing the literature in chronological order or hierarchy of evidence. You need to discuss the methodology of the studies in depth and with more structure. What was the methodology – be overt? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages of each aspect of the methodology of each study in detail. Avoid general statements about research and be specific to the study you are reviewing to demonstrate Masters level understanding.For research studies, consider the sample showing your understanding for each aspect. Discuss the – size; was there a power calculation? Was there a chance of Type I or II error? What was the inclusion/exclusion criterion? Was there bias? Were demographics equal? Are they comparable to your patient group? Are the findings generalisable? Consider the rigour, reliability and validity of the study. Consider the statistical analysis – was it appropriate? Reliable? Biased?Don’t forget to examine the ethical considerations of the research and why these are important.Discuss the findings of the study. What statistical tools were used? Why are they used? Are they appropriate? Give examples of the results in relation to the actual study and then you will be able to show your understanding of these statistical methods. What do these results mean in terms of your aims and clinical practice- reflect.Finish by recapping and considering if the appropriate level of evidence has been achieved and if the study can inform your practice.

Latest Assignment