Must be 500 words or two double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to Chicago Manual of Style
Scotts central argument and development of the thesis.
In your own words, present the central argument, or thesis, of Scotts article.
Where in the text is the thesis stated?
What are Scotts main points? In your own words, explain them succinctly.
Do the main points support the central focus of the article? Why or why not? Be sure to explain your evaluation.
Explain how Scott challenges or builds on prior scholarship.
How does her work relate to other scholarship on the topic?
Explain how Scott critiques or builds on the work of other scholars.
How does she explain the shortcomings or limitations she finds in prior work?
How does she expand on the strengths she finds in prior work?
Analysis of chapter of your choice.
In your own words, present the central argument, or thesis, of this chapter.
How does Scotts work provide a scholarly context for the topic of this chapter?
How does the author evaluate the value of Scotts work?
How does the author build on or develop elements of Scotts work in this chapter? Provide specific examples.
Reflection
How have these readings affected your understanding of gender in history?
What key issues will you keep in mind?
How do you think you might use gender as a category of analysis in your own work?
How do you understand the significance of gender as a category of historical analysis?
Related Completed Projects
Explain the impact of anxiety disorders on quality of life
Discuss the impacts of Basic Anxiety.
What roles do major parties play in Australian politics?
Write a paper on Love, Age, Gender, Ethnicity, and Orientation: Does love differ according to one’s age, sex, gender, ethnicity, or orientation? Relate this to prototypes of love and attitudes and behaviors associated with love.