Explain why social reductionism (also known as relativism) is very compatible with the logicality of morality, but seems incompatible with the practicality of morality.

the global food network, locavorism, organic, “slow” food, vegetarianism, anti-natalism, intellectual integrity, the practicality and logicality of morality, expressivism, biological reductionism, social reductionism, eliminativism, realism, particularism, generalism, principles, arguments, validity, soundness, consequentialism, hedonism, utilitarianism, pleasure, the concept of pleasure, cardinal and ordinal measures, money, social status, the will, good will, free will, law of freedom, law of nature, imperatives, hypothetical imperatives, categorical imperatives, the Categorical Imperative, the Universal Law formula of the Categorical Imperative, maxims, universal laws, and Kant’s example duties
When explaining an argument, please bear in mind that an argument is not a conclusion; it is a set of premises and an inference to a conclusion. To explain the argument, you have to spell out and justify the premises, and show their relationship to the conclusion.

question 1.Explain why social reductionism (also known as relativism) is very compatible with the logicality of morality, but seems incompatible with the practicality of morality. To do this, you must explain reductionism and social reductionism and the logicality and practicality of morality.

Latest Assignment