Scriptural evidence from both the Old Testament and New Testament affirms that Jesus died for everyone.
Introduction
The death and the resurrection of Christ is what gives the believer the courage and the right to be called a child of God. The atonement is the essence and the validity of Christianity, and it is the main reason for Jesus existence on earth through the Virgin Mary. Man had fallen short of the glory of God, and needed a savior to redeem us back unto God again. Jesus was the perfect sacrifice to atone the sins of man, hence, his death on the cross. Objections to the claim of Jesus death for everyone have come from reputable theologians who assert Jesus died for only the elect while other Bible scholars assert he died for all people. Scriptural evidence from both the Old Testament and the New Testament affirms that Jesus died for everyone.
Outline
1. Is the blood of Jesus Christ wasted on those who are Eternally Lost?
A. Calvinistic Perspective- the blood is wasted.
B. Traditional believers perspective- Christs death and blood is not wasted.
2. Why will God condemn the world if Christ died for the world?
A. Limited Atonement believes this is a double punishment. Matthew 25:41; 13:42.
B. Unlimited atonement believes a loving and a just God sent His son to save the world. John 3:17.
3. What is the extent of the atonement?
A. Unlimited atonement believes Jesus died for only the elect.
B. Unlimited atonement believes Jesus died for all men, dead or alive.
Conclusion
The atonement is essentially the means that God used through His son Jesus to reconcile man unto Himself again. His death showed the love of God for all humankind both dead and alive. This is the prove that the blood of Jesus is not wasted, the intent of God of is not to condemn the world but to save it, and the atonement reaches out to all men, and there are scriptural evidence from both the Old Testament and the New Testament that affirm Jesus died for everyone.
Bibliography
Allen L., David. The Atonement: A Biblical, Theological, and Historical Study of the Cross of
Christ. Nashville, TN: B&H Academic, 2019.
—. The Extent of the Atonement: A Historical and Critical Review. Nashville, TN: B&H
Academic, 2016.
Barker D., Mark and Green B. Joel. Recovering the Scandal of the Cross: Atonement in the New
Testament and Contemporary Contexts. Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2011.
Craig Lane William. Atonement and the Death of Christ: Exegetical, Historical, and Philosophical
Exploration. Texas: Baylor University Press, 2020.
Flowers, Leighton. The Potters Promise: A Biblical Defense of Traditional Soteriology.
Colombia, SC: Trinity Academic Press, 2017.
Gotquestions, Limited Atonement, accessed March 5, 2022.
https://www.gotquestions.org/limited-atonement.html.
Gordon K., Joseph. Jesus and the Cross: Necessity, Meaning, and Atonement. Reviews in
Religion and Theology 24, no. 3 (July 2017): 533-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/rirt.13004.
McNall M., Joshua. The Mosaic of Atonement: An Integrated Approach to Christs Work.
Michigan: Zondervan Academic, 2019.
McLachlan, David. Accessible Atonement: Disability, Theology, and the Cross of Christ (Studies
in Religion, Theology, and Disability. Texas: Baylor University Press, 2021.
Myers D., Jeremy. Nothing but the Blood of Jesus: How the Sacrifice of Jesus Saves the World
from Sin. Enumclaw, Washington: Redeeming Press, 2019.
Louth Andrew, Levering Matthew, Horton Michael, Sanders Fred, Greggs Tom. Five Views on
The Extent of the Atonement. Michigan: Zondervan Academic, 2019.
Schuler, Mark. The Sacrifice of Jesus: Understanding the Atonement Biblically. Lutheran
Quarterly 27, no. 4 (Winter 2014): 489-490.
Thomas F., Torrance. Atonement: The Person and Work of Christ. Edited by Robert T. Walker.
Westmont, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2014.
Vidu, Adonis. Atonement, Law, and Justice: The Cross in Historical and Cultural Contexts. Ada,
Michigan: Baker Academic, 2014.
Wedderburn, A. J. M. Jesus and his death: Historiography, the Historical Jesus, and Atonement
Theory. Journal of Theological Studies 58, no. 1 (April 2007): 258-260.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/fl1048.