Write an abstract about the Oil Politics in the Region
The oil politics in the regions has reduced the American capacity to help in the mediations. Studies show that America exploits various strategies to enhance its control and influence on the oil-rich Middle East. Among the techniques it has exploited is putting Israel at the epicenter of its economic interest. The United States of America has viewed Israel as a device to neutralize the interest of some strong nations such including China and Russia. The source illustrates the argument as comprising a trade pact between Israelis and Americans. An example was the Free Trade Agreement between them in 1985. Together with the Military Aid Agreement of 1985, the deal made Israel an essential ally of the U.S. in the region by eight folds. The accord was part of Americas bid to support Israeli security against possible Arab attacks. The case means that the U.S. has continued to cement the place of Israel as its partner. It signifies that the two countries are obliged to protect their mutual interest within and without the economic spectrums. Predictably, the assertion implies that America must protect Israel even during negotiating for harmony in the regions. The approach makes it hard for the U.S. to act as an straightforward broker of any peace deal between Israel and other nations in the oil-rich region. This denotes that the U.S. will always find challenges in reconciling Israel and Palestine because of its oil-based interests in the area. If the war between Palestine and Israel were to escalate and affect Israel economically, this would also have adverse effects on the United States economy. Similarly, the interest in the economic benefit in the Middle East suggests that the America may only be concerned about personal interests. Studies show that since Israel and the U.S. belong to the same international organizations, including the World Trade Organization (WTO) and United Nations (U.N.), it has to protect its economic interest. The reference adds that disturbed markets mean economic disruption for the two countries. As such, the United States may sometimes engage in the peace deal from self-centeredness. The scenario implies that it may work only towards delicate situations that favor it. Besides, it may never engage in acts that are for the good of the U.S. and Israel. The one-sided intervention will mean augmenting the incapacity to participate in effective negotiations in the Middle East.
Sources: Hoekman, Bernard, and Robert Wolfe. “Reforming the World Trade Organization: Practitioner Perspectives from China, the EU, and the US.” China & World Economy 29, no. 4 (2021), 1-34. doi:10.1111/cwe.12378.
