The Heinz dilemma was originally conceived by Jean Piaget, a renowned Swiss psychologist. This dilemma was later used by Lawrence Kohlberg in the development of his “stage” theories of moral development. When completing this assignment, keep in mind that these are theories only and, as your textbook points out, a theory is a convenient tool for expressing an idea…and [therefore,] we must be careful not to pigeonhole ideas [or yourself!] into rigid theoretical boundaries.” Therefore, although you will use the stage theories of moral development as the particular lens through which you will analyze and evaluate solutions to Heinz’s moral dilemma (including your own response) remember that these “stages” are only one tool for describing and evaluating your moral development. They do not define you.
Assignment:
1. Review the textbook sections on stage theories of moral development (Chapter 3, pp. 90-98).
2. Watch the short video below:
3. Write aN essay that addresses the following questions through the lens of Kohlbergs and/or Gilligans stage theories of moral development.
Should Heinz steal the drug?
Why or why not?
If so, should he go to jail?
Why or why not?
What would you do?
Why or why not?
***CONTENT: Moral Argument in Essay Form***
1) Write an essay of 450-600 words, with a minimum of four separate paragraphs.
a) Introduction: one paragraph (includes your thesis statement)
b) Body: 2-5 paragraphs (one paragraph for each premise on which you base your argument)
c) Conclusion: one paragraph (restates/enforces your thesis)
2) Critical thinking and analysis should inform your conclusions.
a) It is fine to state your opinion (you should!) but back up your statements with critical thinking and
evidence, referring to applicable ethical theories and concepts from the textbook readings.
b) HINT: The critique sections in the chapters (after each moral theory is presented) are a good resource
for the type of evidence you need in critical arguments.
3) Observe the minimum/maximum word count (450-600 words is roughly 1 – 2 pages).
a) These short essays are not intended to be exhaustive arguments. Choose the points you think are most
important to specifically address the topic and leave out the rest.
b) The limitations are meant to help refine critical writing and thinking skills such as staying on topic
(eliminating information that detracts from your argument) and stating ideas clearly and succinctly
(avoiding wordiness and repetition of ideas).
4) Use the terminology you are learning from the textbook, wherever applicable.
Related Completed Projects
Identify ways in which the selected play activates its era
Critically assess the main features of a feminist critique of male stream sociology
Discuss the development of the role and power of the US government between Reconstruction and the early 2000s.
Write an outcome on “Does Strength training improve performance in Sport’ using the subtopics provided in the folio.