Assignment is:
This assignment asks you to apply the knowledge you gained from conducting the investigative essay into your chosen topic or issue by closely analyzing two artifacts from your field: 1) a text-based artifact (e.g., a scholarly article, book chapter, or professional publication) and 2) a non-text-based artifact (e.g., an image, video, or podcast). However, rather than analyzing only the texts explicit statements, you will be considering how any feature of the artifacts may function in a rhetorical manner. In other words, you will be looking at how each artifact constructs meaning by framing a multifaceted response to a particular rhetorical situation. By comparing and contrasting these two artifacts, your aim is to describe how each genre attempts to accomplish its respective purposes.
To begin, you will select two artifacts that address the issue you have identified in Project 1. The goal is to work with a single subject but two very different rhetorical approaches to that subject. Then, you will closely consider (read, examine, ponder) and analyze (identify features and explain their function) the artifacts. In order to perform a rhetorical analysis, you will need to have a strong grasp of the subject of the artifacts and a basic understanding of the genres. Only then can you turn your attention to analyzing the rhetorical strategies each employs, including genre conventions, context, author, audience, purpose, rhetorical appeals, exigence, medium, constraints, metaphorical language, active and passive voice, use of visuals, organization, structure, tone, and formality. Finally, you will write an essay that analyzes your two artifacts, paying particular attention to the rhetorical strategies each employs and, perhaps, the effectiveness of the texts. This is in large part a comparison/contrast essay built around rhetorical terminology and solid evidence to support your findings.
.
The article was written comparing 2 video sources. Additionally it did not include MLA formatting for siting sources. We tried to add MLA sourcing we do not think it is syntactically correct.
The article needs to be re-written comparing The Wolf of Wallstreet movie to an article involving Bernie Madoff as the part of the professors critique and assignment was to compare text with video. Please find an appropriate Madoff article for the comparison and remove reference to the “Madoff Affair” documentary. Not sure how many sources are required. MLA 8 or 9 would work.
Related Completed Projects
Write a review on “Three Pillars and Future Impact”
Discuss Valuation and Appraisal (Red Book-compliant valuation report).
Write an essay preparing for the Future of Work
In her TED Talk, Kimberley Screenshot discusses The urgency of internationalist. What is internationalist, and why does Screenshot see it as something urgent? Discuss internationalist from at least one outside, scholarly source as well